|Name:||NRG Solid Reactive|
|Box Finish:||2000 Abralon|
|Color:||Black / Purple|
|Name:||Inverted Fe2 Technology|
Storm’s new Hy-Road Nano takes the symmetrical Inverted Fe2 weight block from the previous Hy-Roads and surrounds it with the NRG Solid Reactive cover from balls like the Virtual Gravity Nano and IQ Tour Nano. This coverstock is finished with a 2000 Abralon pad, which seemed cleaner on this ball through the front of the lane than it was on past balls that used this box finish. We found the Hy-Road Nano to offer more length, back end, and total hook than the Torrent, which was Storm’s last Thunder line release. Our testers felt that the Nano’s cleaner motion through the heads helped it retain more energy for a bigger move on the back end than the Hy-Road Solid from several years ago.
We liked the Hy-Road Nano best on our medium oil test pattern. Tweener and Cranker had a slightly better reaction than Stroker on the fresh. They saw their balls clear the front of the lane much more easily than they expected that a ball with the NRG Solid coverstock would on this pattern. This kept their balls from reading early and then burning up at the breakpoint and back end. They could miss to the dry and the Hy-Road Nano would roll off the spot instead of over-hooking off the spot. Stroker had a good reaction, but with his lower ...
Storm Hy-Road Nano Comparisons
Click below to see a comparison table of the pair of bowling balls shown:
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Code Red
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Hy-Road
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Hy-Road Solid
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Intense
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Sure Lock
- Storm Hy-Road Nano vs. Storm Torrent
To compare the Storm Hy-Road Nano to any other bowling ball(s), please use our Bowling Ball Comparison tool.
Additional Storm Hy-Road Nano Resources
Click here to visit Storm's website to read the manufacturer-supplied information on this ball. Also, see below for the manufacturer-produced promotional video for this ball.
Please remember that our reviews are solely based on our own test results and that you may sometimes find discrepancies between our comments / ratings and the manufacturer's claims. Links to these manufacturer resources are provided here strictly for convenience purposes.